The Court of Appeal today commenced hearings into a Writ of Quo Warranto application filed against Parliamentarian Archchuna Ramanathan, challenging his eligibility to continue holding office as a Member of Parliament.
The petition was filed by Oshala Herath, leader of the Abhinawa Niwahal Peramuna, who claims that MP Ramanathan submitted his nomination for the recent general election while still serving as a government medical officer. Herath argues that submitting nominations without first resigning from government service violates provisions of the Parliamentary Elections Act.
The case was heard before Justices Mayadunne Corea and Mahen Gopallawa. Counsel N.K. Ashokbharan, appearing for the Petitioner, submitted that MP Ramanathan is constitutionally disqualified to be elected, to sit, or to vote in Parliament as he remains a public officer. He cited Article 66(e) of the Constitution, arguing that the MP’s seat has effectively become vacant. He also requested interim relief preventing the MP from functioning until the Court delivers its final ruling.
Additional Solicitor General Sumathi Dharmawardhana PC, appearing for the State, confirmed that MP Ramanathan is still considered a public officer. He raised concern over the constitutional implications, highlighting that as per Article 55(3), disciplinary authority over public officers lies with the Public Service Commission (PSC). However, under Article 55(5), a Member of Parliament has supervisory authority over the PSC. The State submitted that this results in a clear conflict, as MP Ramanathan—who is under interdiction—now holds oversight over the very body responsible for his own disciplinary matters.
The case was adjourned until July 2, 2025, for submissions from counsel representing MP Ramanathan.
Counsel N.K. Ashokbharan with Shenal Fernando appeared for the Petitioner. Senani Dayaratne with Nishadi Wickramasinghe appeared for MP Archchuna Ramanathan. Additional Solicitor General Sumathi Dharmawardhana PC appeared for the State parties. (Newswire)